drivers/staging/lustre: Nuke an unsigned >= 0 assert
authorValdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:36:53 +0000 (19:36 -0500)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:21:27 +0000 (14:21 -0800)
Writing asserts for almost-never-can-happen things can be valuable.
Writing an assert that tests that an "unsigned int" hasn't gone negative
isn't.

And it generates an *ugly* message:

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw.c:763:20: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Wtype-limits]
  LASSERTF(reserved >= 0, "reserved %lu\n", reserved);
                    ^
include/linux/compiler.h:137:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
 #  define unlikely(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : __branch_check__(x, 0))
                                             ^
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw.c:763:2: note: in expansion of macro 'LASSERTF'
  LASSERTF(reserved >= 0, "reserved %lu\n", reserved);
  ^
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw.c:763:20: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Wtype-limits]
  LASSERTF(reserved >= 0, "reserved %lu\n", reserved);
                    ^
include/linux/compiler.h:137:53: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
 #  define unlikely(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : __branch_check__(x, 0))
                                                     ^
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw.c:763:2: note: in expansion of macro 'LASSERTF'
  LASSERTF(reserved >= 0, "reserved %lu\n", reserved);
  ^
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw.c:763:20: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true [-Wtype-limits]
  LASSERTF(reserved >= 0, "reserved %lu\n", reserved);
                    ^
include/linux/compiler.h:110:47: note: in definition of macro 'likely_notrace'
 #define likely_notrace(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
                                               ^
include/linux/compiler.h:137:58: note: in expansion of macro '__branch_check__'
 #  define unlikely(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? !!(x) : __branch_check__(x, 0))
                                                          ^
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/../include/linux/../../../include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h:58:6: note: in expansion of macro 'unlikely'
  if (unlikely(!(cond))) {     \
      ^
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw.c:763:2: note: in expansion of macro 'LASSERTF'
  LASSERTF(reserved >= 0, "reserved %lu\n", reserved);
  ^

Umm, thank you, GCC.  We'll delete the problem line so we never see that spew again.

Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/rw.c

index f355474967d62617319859e8df2830795a0a5458..6b587d66d1b384326d45db5b9757871b7e7088a4 100644 (file)
@@ -764,7 +764,6 @@ int ll_readahead(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io *io,
        ret = ll_read_ahead_pages(env, io, queue,
                                  ria, &reserved, mapping, &ra_end);
 
-       LASSERTF(reserved >= 0, "reserved %lu\n", reserved);
        if (reserved != 0)
                ll_ra_count_put(ll_i2sbi(inode), reserved);