drm/i915/execlists: Mark up priority boost on preemption
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:51:55 +0000 (13:51 +0000)
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:25:58 +0000 (14:25 +0000)
Record the priority boost we giving to the preempted client or else we
may end up in a situation where the priority queue no longer matches the
request priority order and so we can end up in an infinite loop of
preempting the same pair of requests.

Fixes: e9eaf82d97a2 ("drm/i915: Priority boost for waiting clients")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190123135155.21562-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c

index 436e59724900b87a52cc6ec63f2def592b492e93..8aa8a486254319a77666e49a851b1bfad78bed7f 100644 (file)
@@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ static void __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
         */
        if (!(prio & I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT)) {
                prio |= I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT;
+               active->sched.attr.priority = prio;
                list_move_tail(&active->sched.link,
                               i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio));
        }
@@ -625,6 +626,9 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
                int i;
 
                priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) {
+                       GEM_BUG_ON(last &&
+                                  need_preempt(engine, last, rq_prio(rq)));
+
                        /*
                         * Can we combine this request with the current port?
                         * It has to be the same context/ringbuffer and not