r25046: Ditch tdb_traverse() as it doesn't lend itself to any Python idioms
authorTim Potter <tpot@samba.org>
Sun, 9 Sep 2007 12:02:51 +0000 (12:02 +0000)
committerGerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org>
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:05:48 +0000 (15:05 -0500)
and the semantics can be reproduced using tdb_firstkey() and
tdb_nextkey().  Oh, and also because I can't figure out how to get SWIG
to do exactly what I want here.
(This used to be commit 59b44a9796c8254c59ff110c436d8832af81bedc)

source4/lib/tdb/swig/tdb.i

index 892a4de63ff2700dd644630a16185165a6b6c141..1ff21f53b51321c59b463f396b4dd837f70e429d 100644 (file)
@@ -149,6 +149,4 @@ TDB_DATA tdb_firstkey(TDB_CONTEXT *tdb);
 
 TDB_DATA tdb_nextkey(TDB_CONTEXT *tdb, TDB_DATA key);
 
-int tdb_traverse(TDB_CONTEXT *tdb, tdb_traverse_func fn, void *state);
-
 int tdb_exists(TDB_CONTEXT *tdb, TDB_DATA key);