s4-auth: Support password history correctly, including allowing NTLM logins using...
authorAndrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Sun, 10 Nov 2013 21:38:03 +0000 (10:38 +1300)
committerStefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:12:47 +0000 (17:12 +0200)
This is only done during a 1 hour allowed period, by default.

We only update bad password count when not one of the last 3 passwords

Andrew Bartlett

Change-Id: I76fd8010ce273a21efb55f9601d17b9978a0acf0
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
selftest/knownfail
source4/auth/ntlm/auth_sam.c
source4/auth/sam.c

index 40850ab26d664943a9ddcbcfe9d3d257d4db323f..1d60314feaa89908779c34a5fd151150cb135991 100644 (file)
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@
 ^samba4.rpc.netlogon.*.GetTrustPasswords
 ^samba4.rpc.netlogon.*.DatabaseRedo
 ^samba4.rpc.netlogon.*.ServerGetTrustInfo
-^samba4.rpc.samr.passwords.badpwdcount # Not provided by Samba 4 yet
 ^samba4.base.charset.*.Testing partial surrogate
 ^samba4.*.base.maximum_allowed         # broken until we implement NTCREATEX_OPTIONS_BACKUP_INTENT
 .*net.api.delshare.*                           # DelShare isn't implemented yet
index b66eb50f48d11d48b9882f9e08ea12b1c850d1ae..6b184f8d32e45aeeaaca84b7d0ac7ff629992c00 100644 (file)
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include "param/param.h"
 #include "librpc/gen_ndr/ndr_irpc_c.h"
 #include "lib/messaging/irpc.h"
+#include "libcli/auth/libcli_auth.h"
 
 NTSTATUS auth_sam_init(void);
 
@@ -177,32 +178,45 @@ static void auth_sam_trigger_repl_secret(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
 }
 
 
-static NTSTATUS authsam_authenticate(struct auth4_context *auth_context, 
-                                    TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct ldb_context *sam_ctx, 
-                                    struct ldb_dn *domain_dn,
-                                    struct ldb_message *msg,
-                                    const struct auth_usersupplied_info *user_info, 
-                                    DATA_BLOB *user_sess_key, DATA_BLOB *lm_sess_key) 
+/*
+ * Check that a password is OK, and update badPwdCount if required.
+ */
+
+static NTSTATUS authsam_password_check_and_record(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
+                                                 TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
+                                                 struct ldb_dn *domain_dn,
+                                                 struct ldb_message *msg,
+                                                 uint16_t acct_flags,
+                                                 const struct auth_usersupplied_info *user_info,
+                                                 DATA_BLOB *user_sess_key,
+                                                 DATA_BLOB *lm_sess_key)
 {
-       struct samr_Password *lm_pwd, *nt_pwd;
        NTSTATUS nt_status;
+       NTSTATUS auth_status;
        TALLOC_CTX *tmp_ctx;
-       uint16_t acct_flags = samdb_result_acct_flags(msg, NULL);
+       int i, ret;
+       int history_len = 0;
+       struct ldb_context *sam_ctx = auth_context->sam_ctx;
+       const char * const attrs[] = { "pwdHistoryLength", NULL };
+       struct ldb_message *dom_msg;
+       struct samr_Password *lm_pwd;
+       struct samr_Password *nt_pwd;
 
        tmp_ctx = talloc_new(mem_ctx);
        if (tmp_ctx == NULL) {
                return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY;
        }
 
-       /* You can only do an interactive login to normal accounts */
-       if (user_info->flags & USER_INFO_INTERACTIVE_LOGON) {
-               if (!(acct_flags & ACB_NORMAL)) {
-                       TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
-                       return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
-               }
-       }
-
-       nt_status = samdb_result_passwords(tmp_ctx, auth_context->lp_ctx, msg, &lm_pwd, &nt_pwd);
+       /*
+        * This call does more than what it appears to do, it also
+        * checks for the account lockout.
+        *
+        * It is done here so that all parts of Samba that read the
+        * password refuse to even operate on it if the account is
+        * locked out, to avoid mistakes like CVE-2013-4496.
+        */
+       nt_status = samdb_result_passwords(tmp_ctx, auth_context->lp_ctx,
+                                          msg, &lm_pwd, &nt_pwd);
        if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
                TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
                return nt_status;
@@ -211,7 +225,8 @@ static NTSTATUS authsam_authenticate(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
        if (lm_pwd == NULL && nt_pwd == NULL) {
                bool am_rodc;
                if (samdb_rodc(auth_context->sam_ctx, &am_rodc) == LDB_SUCCESS && am_rodc) {
-                       /* we don't have passwords for this
+                       /*
+                        * we don't have passwords for this
                         * account. We are an RODC, and this account
                         * may be one for which we either are denied
                         * REPL_SECRET replication or we haven't yet
@@ -228,16 +243,271 @@ static NTSTATUS authsam_authenticate(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
                }
        }
 
-       nt_status = authsam_password_ok(auth_context, tmp_ctx,
-                                       acct_flags, lm_pwd, nt_pwd,
-                                       user_info, user_sess_key, lm_sess_key);
-       if (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(nt_status, NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD)) {
-               NTSTATUS update_bad_pwd_count_status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(auth_context->sam_ctx, msg, domain_dn);
-               if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(update_bad_pwd_count_status)) {
-                       /* bo! (what can we do here? */
+       auth_status = authsam_password_ok(auth_context, tmp_ctx,
+                                         acct_flags,
+                                         lm_pwd, nt_pwd,
+                                         user_info,
+                                         user_sess_key, lm_sess_key);
+       if (NT_STATUS_IS_OK(auth_status)) {
+               if (user_sess_key->data) {
+                       talloc_steal(mem_ctx, user_sess_key->data);
+               }
+               if (lm_sess_key->data) {
+                       talloc_steal(mem_ctx, lm_sess_key->data);
                }
+               TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+               return NT_STATUS_OK;
+       }
+       *user_sess_key = data_blob_null;
+       *lm_sess_key = data_blob_null;
+
+       if (!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(auth_status, NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD)) {
+               TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+               return auth_status;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * We only continue if this was a wrong password
+        * and we'll always return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
+        * no matter what error happens.
+        */
+
+       /* pull the domain password property attributes */
+       ret = dsdb_search_one(sam_ctx, tmp_ctx, &dom_msg, domain_dn, LDB_SCOPE_BASE,
+                             attrs, 0, "objectClass=domain");
+       if (ret == LDB_SUCCESS) {
+               history_len = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_uint(dom_msg, "pwdHistoryLength", 0);
+       } else if (ret == LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT) {
+               DEBUG(3,("Couldn't find domain %s: %s!\n",
+                        ldb_dn_get_linearized(domain_dn),
+                        ldb_errstring(sam_ctx)));
+       } else {
+               DEBUG(3,("error finding domain %s: %s!\n",
+                        ldb_dn_get_linearized(domain_dn),
+                        ldb_errstring(sam_ctx)));
        }
 
+       for (i = 1; i < MIN(history_len, 3); i++) {
+               static const struct samr_Password zero_hash;
+               struct samr_Password zero_string_hash;
+               struct samr_Password zero_string_des_hash;
+               struct samr_Password *nt_history_pwd = NULL;
+               struct samr_Password *lm_history_pwd = NULL;
+               NTTIME pwdLastSet;
+               NTTIME now;
+               int allowed_period_mins;
+               NTTIME allowed_period;
+
+               nt_status = samdb_result_passwords_from_history(tmp_ctx,
+                                                       auth_context->lp_ctx,
+                                                       msg, i,
+                                                       &lm_history_pwd,
+                                                       &nt_history_pwd);
+               if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
+                       /*
+                        * If we don't find element 'i' we won't find
+                        * 'i+1' ...
+                        */
+                       break;
+               }
+
+               /*
+                * We choose to avoid any issues
+                * around different LM and NT history
+                * lengths by only checking the NT
+                * history
+                */
+               if (nt_history_pwd == NULL) {
+                       /*
+                        * If we don't find element 'i' we won't find
+                        * 'i+1' ...
+                        */
+                       break;
+               }
+
+               /* Skip over all-zero hashes in the history */
+               if (memcmp(nt_history_pwd->hash, zero_hash.hash, 16) == 0) {
+                       continue;
+               }
+
+               /*
+                * This looks odd, but the password_hash module writes this in if
+                * (somehow) we didn't have an old NT hash
+                */
+
+               E_md4hash("", zero_string_hash.hash);
+               if (memcmp(nt_history_pwd->hash, zero_string_hash.hash, 16) == 0) {
+                       continue;
+               }
+
+               E_deshash("", zero_string_des_hash.hash);
+               if (!lm_history_pwd || memcmp(lm_history_pwd->hash, zero_string_des_hash.hash, 16) == 0) {
+                       lm_history_pwd = NULL;
+               }
+
+               auth_status = authsam_password_ok(auth_context, tmp_ctx,
+                                                 acct_flags,
+                                                 lm_history_pwd,
+                                                 nt_history_pwd,
+                                                 user_info,
+                                                 user_sess_key,
+                                                 lm_sess_key);
+               if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(auth_status)) {
+                       /*
+                        * If this was not a correct password, try the next
+                        * one from the history
+                        */
+                       *user_sess_key = data_blob_null;
+                       *lm_sess_key = data_blob_null;
+                       continue;
+               }
+
+               if (i != 1) {
+                       /*
+                        * The authentication was OK, but not against
+                        * the previous password, which is stored at index 1.
+                        *
+                        * We just return the original wrong password.
+                        * This skips the update of the bad pwd count,
+                        * because this is almost certainly user error
+                        * (or automatic login on a computer using a cached
+                        * password from before the password change),
+                        * not an attack.
+                        */
+                       TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+                       return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+               }
+
+               if (user_info->password_state != AUTH_PASSWORD_RESPONSE) {
+                       /*
+                        * The authentication was OK against the previous password,
+                        * but it's not a NTLM network authentication.
+                        *
+                        * We just return the original wrong password.
+                        * This skips the update of the bad pwd count,
+                        * because this is almost certainly user error
+                        * (or automatic login on a computer using a cached
+                        * password from before the password change),
+                        * not an attack.
+                        */
+                       TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+                       return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+               }
+
+               /*
+                * If the password was OK, it's a NTLM network authentication
+                * and it was the previous password.
+                *
+                * Now we see if it is within the grace period,
+                * so that we don't break cached sessions on other computers
+                * before the user can lock and unlock their other screens
+                * (resetting their cached password).
+                *
+                * See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/906305
+                * OldPasswordAllowedPeriod ("old password allowed period")
+                * is specified in minutes. The default is 60.
+                */
+               allowed_period_mins = lpcfg_old_password_allowed_period(auth_context->lp_ctx);
+               /*
+                * NTTIME uses 100ns units
+                */
+               allowed_period = allowed_period_mins * 60 * 1000*1000*10;
+               pwdLastSet = samdb_result_nttime(msg, "pwdLastSet", 0);
+               unix_to_nt_time(&now, time(NULL));
+
+               if (now < pwdLastSet) {
+                       /*
+                        * time jump?
+                        *
+                        * We just return the original wrong password.
+                        * This skips the update of the bad pwd count,
+                        * because this is almost certainly user error
+                        * (or automatic login on a computer using a cached
+                        * password from before the password change),
+                        * not an attack.
+                        */
+                       TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+                       return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+               }
+
+               if ((now - pwdLastSet) >= allowed_period) {
+                       /*
+                        * The allowed period is over.
+                        *
+                        * We just return the original wrong password.
+                        * This skips the update of the bad pwd count,
+                        * because this is almost certainly user error
+                        * (or automatic login on a computer using a cached
+                        * password from before the password change),
+                        * not an attack.
+                        */
+                       TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+                       return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+               }
+
+               /*
+                * We finally allow the authentication with the
+                * previous password within the allowed period.
+                */
+               if (user_sess_key->data) {
+                       talloc_steal(mem_ctx, user_sess_key->data);
+               }
+               if (lm_sess_key->data) {
+                       talloc_steal(mem_ctx, lm_sess_key->data);
+               }
+
+               TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+               return auth_status;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * If we are not in the allowed period or match an old password,
+        * we didn't return early. Now update the badPwdCount et al.
+        */
+       nt_status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(auth_context->sam_ctx,
+                                                msg, domain_dn);
+       if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
+               /*
+                * We need to return the original
+                * NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD error, so there isn't
+                * anything more we can do than write something into
+                * the log
+                */
+               DEBUG(0, ("Failed to note bad password for user [%s]: %s\n",
+                         user_info->mapped.account_name,
+                         nt_errstr(nt_status)));
+       }
+
+       TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+       return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+}
+
+static NTSTATUS authsam_authenticate(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
+                                    TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct ldb_context *sam_ctx,
+                                    struct ldb_dn *domain_dn,
+                                    struct ldb_message *msg,
+                                    const struct auth_usersupplied_info *user_info,
+                                    DATA_BLOB *user_sess_key, DATA_BLOB *lm_sess_key)
+{
+       NTSTATUS nt_status;
+       uint16_t acct_flags = samdb_result_acct_flags(msg, NULL);
+       TALLOC_CTX *tmp_ctx = talloc_new(mem_ctx);
+       if (!tmp_ctx) {
+               return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY;
+       }
+
+       /* You can only do an interactive login to normal accounts */
+       if (user_info->flags & USER_INFO_INTERACTIVE_LOGON) {
+               if (!(acct_flags & ACB_NORMAL)) {
+                       TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+                       return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
+               }
+       }
+
+       nt_status = authsam_password_check_and_record(auth_context, tmp_ctx,
+                                                     domain_dn, msg, acct_flags,
+                                                     user_info,
+                                                     user_sess_key, lm_sess_key);
        if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
                TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
                return nt_status;
@@ -250,7 +520,6 @@ static NTSTATUS authsam_authenticate(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
                                       user_info->workstation_name,
                                       user_info->mapped.account_name,
                                       false, false);
-
        if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
                TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
                return nt_status;
index e4df612e26feb79fcd8ad4e155e96657cafb46d6..f7bc6939dd71febd70fe0d456c238e94f190dc78 100644 (file)
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ const char *user_attrs[] = {
        "primaryGroupID",
        "memberOf",
        "badPasswordTime",
+       "lmPwdHistory",
+       "ntPwdHistory",
        NULL,
 };