From: Lukas Czerner Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:51:46 +0000 (+0100) Subject: fuse: fix use-after-free in fuse_direct_IO() X-Git-Tag: v4.20-rc3~14^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.samba.org/samba.git/?p=sfrench%2Fcifs-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=ebacb81273599555a7a19f7754a1451206a5fc4f;hp=2d84a2d19b6150c6dbac1e6ebad9c82e4c123772 fuse: fix use-after-free in fuse_direct_IO() In async IO blocking case the additional reference to the io is taken for it to survive fuse_aio_complete(). In non blocking case this additional reference is not needed, however we still reference io to figure out whether to wait for completion or not. This is wrong and will lead to use-after-free. Fix it by storing blocking information in separate variable. This was spotted by KASAN when running generic/208 fstest. Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner Reported-by: Zorro Lang Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Fixes: 744742d692e3 ("fuse: Add reference counting for fuse_io_priv") Cc: # v4.6 --- diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c index cc2121b37bf5..b52f9baaa3e7 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/file.c +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c @@ -2924,10 +2924,12 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter) } if (io->async) { + bool blocking = io->blocking; + fuse_aio_complete(io, ret < 0 ? ret : 0, -1); /* we have a non-extending, async request, so return */ - if (!io->blocking) + if (!blocking) return -EIOCBQUEUED; wait_for_completion(&wait);