fs/file_table.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
authorMatthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com>
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:39:56 +0000 (23:39 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:53:38 +0000 (11:53 -0700)
fs/file_table.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
in fs_may_remount_ro()

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
fs/file_table.c

index 3176fefc92e139771a9c9065524c26e8e437e7fa..664e3f2309b89811b028603da0f17a6e266ee9fd 100644 (file)
@@ -323,12 +323,11 @@ void file_kill(struct file *file)
 
 int fs_may_remount_ro(struct super_block *sb)
 {
-       struct list_head *p;
+       struct file *file;
 
        /* Check that no files are currently opened for writing. */
        file_list_lock();
-       list_for_each(p, &sb->s_files) {
-               struct file *file = list_entry(p, struct file, f_u.fu_list);
+       list_for_each_entry(file, &sb->s_files, f_u.fu_list) {
                struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
 
                /* File with pending delete? */