We found the I2C controller count register is unreliable sometimes,
that will cause I2C to lose data. Thus we can read the data count
from 'i2c_dev->count' instead of the I2C controller count register.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id;
struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK);
struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id;
struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK);
- u32 i2c_count = readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_COUNT);
u32 i2c_tran;
if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count >= I2C_FIFO_FULL_THLD;
else
u32 i2c_tran;
if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count >= I2C_FIFO_FULL_THLD;
else
+ i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count;
/*
* If we got one ACK from slave when writing data, and we did not
/*
* If we got one ACK from slave when writing data, and we did not
{
struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id;
struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
{
struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id;
struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
- u32 i2c_count = readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_COUNT);
bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK);
u32 i2c_tran;
if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count >= I2C_FIFO_FULL_THLD;
else
bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK);
u32 i2c_tran;
if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count >= I2C_FIFO_FULL_THLD;
else
+ i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count;
/*
* If we did not get one ACK from slave when writing data, then we
/*
* If we did not get one ACK from slave when writing data, then we