[NETFILTER]: nf_nat_h323: call set_h225_addr instead of set_h225_addr_hook
authorJing Min Zhao <zhaojingmin@vivecode.com>
Thu, 24 May 2007 23:44:40 +0000 (16:44 -0700)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Thu, 24 May 2007 23:44:40 +0000 (16:44 -0700)
They're the same.

Signed-off-by: Jing Min Zhao <zhaojingmin@vivecode.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_h323.c

index fcebc968d37f67681cd52a8f0094029544a730fa..c5d2a2d690b84e54b558ac8e558b6c0550a7ac36 100644 (file)
@@ -455,9 +455,9 @@ static int nat_q931(struct sk_buff **pskb, struct nf_conn *ct,
                if (idx > 0 &&
                    get_h225_addr(ct, *data, &taddr[0], &addr, &port) &&
                    (ntohl(addr.ip) & 0xff000000) == 0x7f000000) {
                if (idx > 0 &&
                    get_h225_addr(ct, *data, &taddr[0], &addr, &port) &&
                    (ntohl(addr.ip) & 0xff000000) == 0x7f000000) {
-                       set_h225_addr_hook(pskb, data, 0, &taddr[0],
-                                          &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3,
-                                          info->sig_port[!dir]);
+                       set_h225_addr(pskb, data, 0, &taddr[0],
+                                     &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3,
+                                     info->sig_port[!dir]);
                }
        } else {
                nf_conntrack_unexpect_related(exp);
                }
        } else {
                nf_conntrack_unexpect_related(exp);