completion: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair
authorPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:47:04 +0000 (12:47 -0700)
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:06:44 +0000 (08:06 -0700)
commitdec13c42d21a96adc5d0d25510d0b59775dfd2ec
tree03793a9146da912adad6b5b661a3595730b6eaf4
parent23a9b748a3d27f67cdb078fcb891a920285e75d9
completion: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair

There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair.  This commit therefore replaces the spin_unlock_wait() call in
completion_done() with spin_lock() followed immediately by spin_unlock().
This should be safe from a performance perspective because the lock
will be held only the wakeup happens really quickly.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
kernel/sched/completion.c