r21395: fix comments

metze

diff --git a/source/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c b/source/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
index 58a408a3d9adee4ae6e285496ab1b77cdf920df0..a2fe2a85db02b6c7f6c12c58075081515cd5b3c2 100644 (file)
--- a/source/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
+++ b/source/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
  * Once this is done (which could update anything at all), we
  * calculate the password hashes.
  *
- * This function must not only update the ntPwdHash, lmPwdHash and
+ * This function must not only update the unicodePwd, dBCSPwd and
  * krb5Key fields, it must also atomicly increment the
  * msDS-KeyVersionNumber.  We should be in a transaction, so all this
  * should be quite safe...
@@ -625,11 +625,11 @@ static int password_hash_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
        }
 
        if (ntAttr && (ntAttr->num_values > 1)) {
-               ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "mupltiple values for lmPwdHash not allowed!\n");
+               ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "mupltiple values for unicodePwd not allowed!\n");
                return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
        }
        if (lmAttr && (lmAttr->num_values > 1)) {
-               ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "mupltiple values for lmPwdHash not allowed!\n");
+               ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "mupltiple values for dBCSPwd not allowed!\n");
                return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
        }
 
@@ -639,11 +639,11 @@ static int password_hash_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
        }
 
        if (ntAttr && (ntAttr->num_values == 0)) {
-               ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "lmPwdHash must have a value!\n");
+               ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "unicodePwd must have a value!\n");
                return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
        }
        if (lmAttr && (lmAttr->num_values == 0)) {
-               ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "lmPwdHash must have a value!\n");
+               ldb_set_errstring(module->ldb, "dBCSPwd must have a value!\n");
                return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
        }
 
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static int password_hash_add_do_add(struct ldb_handle *h) {
                }
        }
 
-       /* add also krb5 keys based on NT the hash (we might have ntPwdHash, but not the cleartext */
+       /* add also krb5 keys based on NT the hash (we might have unicodePwd, but not the cleartext */
        ret = add_krb5_keys_from_NThash(ac->module, msg, smb_krb5_context);
        if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) {
                return ret;
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ static int password_hash_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *r
                return LDB_ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION;
        }
 
-       /* If no part of this touches the sambaPassword OR ntPwdHash and/or lmPwdHash, then we don't
+       /* If no part of this touches the sambaPassword OR unicodePwd and/or dBCSPwd, then we don't
         * need to make any changes.  For password changes/set there should
         * be a 'delete' or a 'modify' on this attribute. */
        /* If the only operation is the deletion of the passwords then go on */