s4:dsdb/acl: reorganize the logic flow in the password filtering checks

[kai/samba.git] / README.Coding

diff --git a/README.Coding b/README.Coding
index 12997ccf9addaa925f62d1622c5cb55f51aaa29e..956a733a4ce77e7d4b7dd4ceec0dd6449bc3a323 100644 (file)
--- a/README.Coding
+++ b/README.Coding
@@ -21,9 +21,13 @@ coding style (See Documentation/CodingStyle in the kernel source tree). This
 closely matches what most Samba developers use already anyways, with a few
 exceptions as mentioned below.
 
-The coding style for Python code is documented in PEP8, http://www.python.org/pep/pep8.
-If you have ever worked on another free software python project, you are probably
-already familiar with it.
+The coding style for Python code is documented in PEP8,
+http://www.python.org/pep/pep8 (with spaces). 
+If you have ever worked on another free software Python project, you are
+probably already familiar with it.
+
+We try to stay compatible with Python 2.4, so please don't rely on any
+features that were introduced later, such as the "with" statement.
 
 But to save you the trouble of reading the Linux kernel style guide, here
 are the highlights.
@@ -363,3 +367,13 @@ Bad Example:
        ret = some_function_my_name(get_some_name());
        ...
 
+Control-Flow changing macros
+----------------------------
+
+Macros like NT_STATUS_NOT_OK_RETURN that change control flow
+(return/goto/etc) from within the macro are considered bad, because
+they look like function calls that never change control flow. Please
+do not use them in new code.
+
+The only exception is the test code that depends repeated use of calls
+like CHECK_STATUS, CHECK_VAL and others.