Kill off 'restrict anonymous' becouse it is useless in its current form.

To be replaced with a real restriction in consultation with jra.  (Hence why
I've not touched loadparm.c).

Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 95901449158a4ef7f95f75b22f63f6f8d43a01fe)

diff --git a/source3/smbd/sesssetup.c b/source3/smbd/sesssetup.c
index e2edd5703ecba5db6f989cae153ea53d436d75b7..6a2bfc2d974be48ee018000fe8bda0d9d9374dc9 100644 (file)
--- a/source3/smbd/sesssetup.c
+++ b/source3/smbd/sesssetup.c
@@ -571,32 +571,6 @@ int reply_sesssetup_and_X(connection_struct *conn, char *inbuf,char *outbuf,
                                passlen2 = 0;
                }
                
                                passlen2 = 0;
                }
                

-               if (lp_restrict_anonymous()) {
-                       /* there seems to be no reason behind the
-                        * differences in MS clients formatting
-                        * various info like the domain, NativeOS, and
-                        * NativeLanMan fields. Win95 in particular
-                        * seems to have an extra null byte between
-                        * the username and the domain, or the
-                        * password length calculation is wrong, which
-                        * throws off the string extraction routines
-                        * below.  This makes the value of domain be
-                        * the empty string, which fails the restrict
-                        * anonymous check further down.  This
-                        * compensates for that, and allows browsing
-                        * to work in mixed NT and win95 environments
-                        * even when restrict anonymous is true. AAB
-                        * */
-                       dump_data(100, p, 0x70);
-                       DEBUG(9, ("passlen1=%d, passlen2=%d\n", passlen1, passlen2));
-                       if (ra_type == RA_WIN95 && !passlen1 && !passlen2 && p[0] == 0 && p[1] == 0) {
-                               DEBUG(0, ("restrict anonymous parameter used in a win95 environment!\n"));
-                               DEBUG(0, ("client is win95 and broken passlen1 offset -- attempting fix\n"));
-                               DEBUG(0, ("if win95 cilents are having difficulty browsing, you will be unable to use restrict anonymous\n"));
-                               passlen1 = 1;
-                       }
-               }
-               

                /* Save the lanman2 password and the NT md4 password. */
                
                if ((doencrypt) && (passlen1 != 0) && (passlen1 != 24)) {
                /* Save the lanman2 password and the NT md4 password. */
                
                if ((doencrypt) && (passlen1 != 0) && (passlen1 != 24)) {


@@ -664,27 +638,6 @@ int reply_sesssetup_and_X(connection_struct *conn, char *inbuf,char *outbuf,
                *user = 0;
        }
        
                *user = 0;
        }
        

-       if (done_sesssetup && lp_restrict_anonymous()) {
-               /* tests show that even if browsing is done over
-                * already validated connections without a username
-                * and password the domain is still provided, which it
-                * wouldn't be if it was a purely anonymous
-                * connection.  So, in order to restrict anonymous, we
-                * only deny connections that have no session
-                * information.  If a domain has been provided, then
-                * it's not a purely anonymous connection. AAB */
-               if (!*user && !*domain) {
-                       DEBUG(0, ("restrict anonymous is True and anonymous connection attempted. Denying access.\n"));
-                       
-                       data_blob_free(&lm_resp);
-                       data_blob_free(&nt_resp);
-                       data_blob_clear_free(&plaintext_password);
-
-                       END_PROFILE(SMBsesssetupX);
-                       return ERROR_DOS(ERRDOS,ERRnoaccess);
-               }
-       }
-

        if (!make_user_info_for_reply(&user_info, 
                                      user, domain, 
                                      lm_resp, nt_resp,
        if (!make_user_info_for_reply(&user_info, 
                                      user, domain, 
                                      lm_resp, nt_resp,