From 1162b37ff0ce46a578b7e8a6cd92f66a5a1982d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:05:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] r12763: Oops. If you call ldb_search from within an ldb module's search request handler, you really have to watch the recursion issues... Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit 46628e86a2be6d334b2d0427e7052517c7ab1d4c) --- source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c index 09d8e825765..cc6a0d18f4b 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/kludge_acl.c @@ -91,7 +91,9 @@ static int kludge_acl_search(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) struct kludge_private_data *data = talloc_get_type(module->private_data, struct kludge_private_data); int i, j; - if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + /* We may not be fully initialised yet, or we might have just + * got an error */ + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS || !data->password_attrs) { return ret; } -- 2.34.1