From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 04:44:23 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Clarify that 'use spnego = yes' is fine in all known situations.
X-Git-Tag: samba-4.0.0alpha6~801^2~11793^2~2135
X-Git-Url: http://git.samba.org/samba.git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bcc51dcc2f47283e5277dbd5b150f081ba35008d;hp=cf4e0982fdf9ca549eba68791c670a442755f713;p=ira%2Fwip.git

Clarify that 'use spnego = yes' is fine in all known situations.

Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 0944c69636eb60bc1a4b2a2257dd05f6d385bd4d)
---

diff --git a/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml b/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml
index 713d4a012ee..b483a97b317 100644
--- a/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml
+++ b/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml
@@ -7332,9 +7332,9 @@ let "time++"
 		<listitem><para> This variable controls controls whether samba will try 
 		to use Simple and Protected NEGOciation (as specified by rfc2478) with 
 		WindowsXP and Windows2000sp2 clients to agree upon an authentication mechanism. 
-		As of samba 3.0alpha it must be set to "no" for these clients to join a samba 
-		domain controller.  It can be set to "yes" to allow samba to participate in an 
-		AD domain controlled by a Windows2000 domain controller.</para>
+		Unless further issues are discovered with our SPNEGO
+		implementation, there is no reason this should ever be
+		disabled.</para>
 		<para>Default:  <emphasis>use spnego = yes</emphasis></para>
 		</listitem>
 		</varlistentry>