tipc: fix compatibility bug in link monitoring
authorJon Paul Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Thu, 24 Nov 2016 02:05:26 +0000 (21:05 -0500)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sat, 26 Nov 2016 01:06:18 +0000 (20:06 -0500)
commit 817298102b0b ("tipc: fix link priority propagation") introduced a
compatibility problem between TIPC versions newer than Linux 4.6 and
those older than Linux 4.4. In versions later than 4.4, link STATE
messages only contain a non-zero link priority value when the sender
wants the receiver to change its priority. This has the effect that the
receiver resets itself in order to apply the new priority. This works
well, and is consistent with the said commit.

However, in versions older than 4.4 a valid link priority is present in
all sent link STATE messages, leading to cyclic link establishment and
reset on the 4.6+ node.

We fix this by adding a test that the received value should not only
be valid, but also differ from the current value in order to cause the
receiving link endpoint to reset.

Reported-by: Amar Nv <amar.nv005@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
net/tipc/link.c

index 1055164c6232db23e34644aaa9aa39c69753d506..ecc12411155ea0ec7eeb94d5259ab901029b4d0c 100644 (file)
@@ -1492,8 +1492,9 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
                if (in_range(peers_tol, TIPC_MIN_LINK_TOL, TIPC_MAX_LINK_TOL))
                        l->tolerance = peers_tol;
 
-               if (peers_prio && in_range(peers_prio, TIPC_MIN_LINK_PRI,
-                                          TIPC_MAX_LINK_PRI)) {
+               /* Update own prio if peer indicates a different value */
+               if ((peers_prio != l->priority) &&
+                   in_range(peers_prio, 1, TIPC_MAX_LINK_PRI)) {
                        l->priority = peers_prio;
                        rc = tipc_link_fsm_evt(l, LINK_FAILURE_EVT);
                }