locking/core, s390: Make cpu_relax() a barrier again
authorChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:03:13 +0000 (11:03 +0200)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:15:10 +0000 (10:15 +0100)
commit22b6430d36659b37ed139b7fd87fcc7237fb0cfd
treeadf002ab9aa63ff77b1c0e6ca6fbb02f5c63f5df
parentbf0d31c05411f030e7df9f98b5be4d0c6fd5cd39
locking/core, s390: Make cpu_relax() a barrier again

stop_machine() seemed to be the only important place for yielding during
cpu_relax(). This was fixed by using cpu_relax_yield().

Therefore, we can now redefine cpu_relax() to be a barrier instead on s390,
making s390 identical to all other architectures.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477386195-32736-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h