int (*d_delete)(struct dentry *);
void (*d_release)(struct dentry *);
void (*d_iput)(struct dentry *, struct inode *);
+ char *(*d_dname)((struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen);
locking rules:
none have BKL
d_delete: yes no yes no
d_release: no no no yes
d_iput: no no no yes
+d_dname: no no no no
--------------------------- inode_operations ---------------------------
prototypes:
write_super_lockfs: ?
unlockfs: ?
statfs: no no no
-remount_fs: no yes maybe (see below)
+remount_fs: yes yes maybe (see below)
clear_inode: no
umount_begin: yes no no
show_options: no (vfsmount->sem)
int (*releasepage) (struct page *, int);
int (*direct_IO)(int, struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
loff_t offset, unsigned long nr_segs);
+ int (*launder_page) (struct page *);
locking rules:
All except set_page_dirty may block
invalidatepage: no yes
releasepage: no yes
direct_IO: no
+launder_page: no yes
->prepare_write(), ->commit_write(), ->sync_page() and ->readpage()
may be called from the request handler (/dev/loop).
indicate that the buffers are (or may be) freeable. If ->releasepage is zero,
the kernel assumes that the fs has no private interest in the buffers.
+ ->launder_page() may be called prior to releasing a page if
+it is still found to be dirty. It returns zero if the page was successfully
+cleaned, or an error value if not. Note that in order to prevent the page
+getting mapped back in and redirtied, it needs to be kept locked
+across the entire operation.
+
Note: currently almost all instances of address_space methods are
using BKL for internal serialization and that's one of the worst sources
of contention. Normally they are calling library functions (in fs/buffer.c)