From 64263be5346dc19af49ec929bc4caf31f93b16c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rafal Szczesniak Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:52:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] r5367: Minor typo fixes. rafal --- prog_guide.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/prog_guide.txt b/prog_guide.txt index 7aefe9db41c..d4a170b278e 100644 --- a/prog_guide.txt +++ b/prog_guide.txt @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ msrpc code from Samba3", and while to some extent this is true there are extremely important differences in the approach that are worth pointing out. -In the Samba3 msrpc code we used explicit parse strucrures for all +In the Samba3 msrpc code we used explicit parse structures for all msrpc functions. The problem is that we didn't just put all of the real variables in these structures, we also put in all the artifacts as well. A good example is the security descriptor strucrure that @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ parser where to find the following four variables, but they should *NOT* be in the interface structure. In Samba3 there were unwritten rules about which variables in a -strucrure a high level caller has to fill in and which ones are filled +structure a high level caller has to fill in and which ones are filled in by the marshalling code. In Samba4 those rules are gone, because the redundent artifact variables are gone. The high level caller just sets up the real variables and the marshalling code worries about -- 2.34.1