Consistently use snum in check_user_ok
authorVolker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:43:03 +0000 (16:43 +0200)
committerVolker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:49:49 +0000 (19:49 +0200)
Most already used it, these two still used SNUM(conn), where the only caller of
this routine (change_to_user) had set snum = SNUM(conn).
(This used to be commit b14e59bfdbfb62494002e22d0665c4d420484245)

source3/smbd/uid.c

index 04796418bc2fe3e6102a82038125cee5f49023c5..af992d7aee2b6d48a424ee8cd77362c9e4d76443 100644 (file)
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static bool check_user_ok(connection_struct *conn, user_struct *vuser,int snum)
                vuser->server_info->unix_name,
                pdb_get_domain(vuser->server_info->sam_account),
                vuser->server_info->ptok,
-               SNUM(conn));
+               snum);
 
        if (!readonly_share &&
            !share_access_check(vuser->server_info->ptok, lp_servicename(snum),
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static bool check_user_ok(connection_struct *conn, user_struct *vuser,int snum)
                vuser->server_info->unix_name,
                pdb_get_domain(vuser->server_info->sam_account),
                NULL, vuser->server_info->ptok,
-               lp_admin_users(SNUM(conn)));
+               lp_admin_users(snum));
 
        conn->read_only = ent->read_only;
        conn->admin_user = ent->admin_user;