torture: fix and improve the smb2.lock.replay test
authorMichael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:45:17 +0000 (12:45 +0200)
committerMichael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:41:54 +0000 (11:41 +0200)
The test was wrong in that it used an invalid
lock sequence bucket (65) where it actually wanted
to use a valid on (64), and hence the test results
(which were adapted to the real responses) were not
quite logical.

This patch fixes this and also improves some of
the comments so that the flow of the patch becomes
a little more obvious.

Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
source4/torture/smb2/lock.c

index 5b8aefb207639cc98dbe294a45d79604daf0aa2b..105005f92a257e8662017b4d8a3829c4571f6e1b 100644 (file)
@@ -2913,7 +2913,7 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
                .in.file.handle = h
        };
 
-       torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock (ignored) Replay detection:\n");
+       torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock Replay detection [ignored]:\n");
        lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x010 + 0x1;
        el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
@@ -2942,8 +2942,12 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
        status = smb2_ioctl(tree, torture, &ioctl);
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
 
+       /*
+        * Test with an invalid bucket number (only 1..64 are valid).
+        * With an invalid number, lock replay detection is not performed.
+        */
        torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock (ignored) Replay detection "
-                                "(Bucket No: 0):\n");
+                                "(Bucket No: 0 (invalid)) [ignored]:\n");
        lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x000 + 0x1;
        el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
@@ -2987,6 +2991,8 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
 
+       /* status: still locked */
+
        /*
         * Server will not grant same Byte Range using a different Bucket Seq
         */
@@ -2998,11 +3004,25 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
 
        torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock Replay detection "
-                                "(Bucket No: 64):\n");
+                                "(Bucket No: 2):\n");
 
        /*
         * Server will not grant same Byte Range using a different Bucket Num
         */
+       lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x020 + 0x1;
+       el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
+       status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
+       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
+       status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
+       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
+
+       /* status: still locked */
+
+       /* test with invalid bucket when file is locked */
+
+       torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock Replay detection "
+                                "(Bucket No: 65 (invalid)) [ignored]:\n");
+
        lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x410 + 0x1;
        el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
@@ -3010,39 +3030,56 @@ static bool test_replay(struct torture_context *torture,
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
 
-       /*
-        * Test Unlock replay detection
-        */
-       lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x410 + 0x2;
        el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_UNLOCK;
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED);
+
+       /* status: unlocked */
+
+       /*
+        * Lock again for the unlock replay test
+        */
        el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
 
-       lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x410 + 0x3;
-       el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_UNLOCK;
-       status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
-       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+       torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock Replay detection "
+                                "(Bucket No: 64):\n");
 
-       torture_comment(torture, "Testing Lock (ignored) Replay detection "
-                                "(Bucket No: 65):\n");
-       lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x420 + 0x1;
+       /*
+        * Server will not grant same Byte Range using a different Bucket Num
+        */
+       lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x400 + 0x1;
        el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
-       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED);
 
+       /*
+        * Test Unlock replay detection
+        */
+       lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x400 + 0x2;
        el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_UNLOCK;
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
+       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK); /* new seq num ==> unlocked */
+       status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
+       CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK); /* replay detected ==> ignored */
+
+       el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_FAIL_IMMEDIATELY;
+       status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);     /* same seq num ==> ignored */
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
+
+       /* verify it's unlocked: */
+       lck.in.lock_sequence = 0x400 + 0x3;
+       el.flags = SMB2_LOCK_FLAG_UNLOCK;
        status = smb2_lock(tree, &lck);
        CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED);
 
+       /* status: not locked */
+
 done:
        smb2_util_close(tree, h);
        smb2_deltree(tree, BASEDIR);