lib/rbtree.c: fix typo in comment of __rb_insert()
authorWei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fri, 8 Aug 2014 21:22:14 +0000 (14:22 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fri, 8 Aug 2014 22:57:24 +0000 (15:57 -0700)
In case 1, it passes down the BLACK color from G to p and u, and maintains
the color of n.  By doing so, it maintains the black height of the
sub-tree.

While in the comment, it marks the color of n to BLACK.  This is a typo
and not consistents with the code.

This patch fixs this typo in comment.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
lib/rbtree.c

index 65f4effd117f4350bb5dde964eab219f67caf701..c16c81a3d430e84a8084de93e97900715a8e6b8e 100644 (file)
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ __rb_insert(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
                                 *      / \          / \
                                 *     p   u  -->   P   U
                                 *    /            /
-                                *   n            N
+                                *   n            n
                                 *
                                 * However, since g's parent might be red, and
                                 * 4) does not allow this, we need to recurse