/* XXX: The following ugly hack prevents a gcc warning
"ignoring return value of 'strtoul', declared with attribute warn_unused_result"
- which can occur when using certain gcc configurations (see _FORTIFY_SOURCE).
+ which can occur when using certain gcc configurations (see -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE).
A dummy variable is not used because when using gcc 4.6 with -Wextra a
"set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]" warning will occur.
- TBD: will this hack pass muster with other validators such as Coverity, CLang, & etc
+ (Coverity & CLang apparently do not object to this hack).
[Guy Harris comment:
"... perhaps either using spin buttons for numeric preferences, or otherwise making