git.samba.org / kai / samba.git / commit
? search:
summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
(parent: 5ac133b) | patch
Jigger around with the tests a bit more
authorAndrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:58:58 +0000 (13:58 +0000)
committerAndrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:58:58 +0000 (13:58 +0000)
commitdc346a5c6d6b071a67397150f72a530515b5cf53
tree615e95f56f36bdbf2c5ef2ce523b2fad6cbfdf73tree
parent5ac133bac731e3f014df35126dd5ecb87837b8a6commit | diff
Jigger around with the tests a bit more

We now test security=share, security=user, security=server for both the
positive and negitive case (good/bad pw) and check that guest shares work for
share level security.

The server level security stuff seems to test positive without actualy
contating a server (another LIBSMB_PROG based smbd) - I will need to look into that...

Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 19fdc553d6ab06e53c21425468f86da56f4d9153)
14 files changed:
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb-domainsec.test [new file with mode: 0644] blob
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb-listfilesauth.test [deleted file] blob | history
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb-listfilesnpw.test [deleted file] blob | history
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb-serversec.test [new file with mode: 0644] blob
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb-shareguest.test [new file with mode: 0644] blob
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb-sharesec.test [new file with mode: 0644] blob
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb-usersec.test [new file with mode: 0644] blob
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb.fns diff | blob | history
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb.smb.conf.domain [new file with mode: 0644] blob
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb.smb.conf.server [new file with mode: 0644] blob
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb.smb.conf.share [new file with mode: 0644] blob
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb.smb.conf.template diff | blob | history
testsuite/build_farm/basicsmb.smb.conf.user [new file with mode: 0644] blob
testsuite/build_farm/runlist diff | blob | history
Kai's WIP code