vsprintf: split out '%p' handling logic
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sun, 6 Jul 2008 23:16:15 +0000 (16:16 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sun, 6 Jul 2008 23:16:15 +0000 (16:16 -0700)
The actual code is the same, just split out into a helper function.
This makes it easier to read, and allows for simple future extension
of %p handling.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
lib/vsprintf.c

index 926c7e00e2dcc7c9d892ad1686be17fe0e784d64..f569feb7662e3d70f3c5dfae547df979a00d0608 100644 (file)
@@ -511,6 +511,16 @@ static char *string(char *buf, char *end, char *s, int field_width, int precisio
        return buf;
 }
 
+static char *pointer(char *buf, char *end, void *ptr, int field_width, int precision, int flags)
+{
+       flags |= SMALL;
+       if (field_width == -1) {
+               field_width = 2*sizeof(void *);
+               flags |= ZEROPAD;
+       }
+       return number(buf, end, (unsigned long) ptr, 16, field_width, precision, flags);
+}
+
 /**
  * vsnprintf - Format a string and place it in a buffer
  * @buf: The buffer to place the result into
@@ -653,17 +663,9 @@ int vsnprintf(char *buf, size_t size, const char *fmt, va_list args)
                                continue;
 
                        case 'p':
-                               flags |= SMALL;
-                               if (field_width == -1) {
-                                       field_width = 2*sizeof(void *);
-                                       flags |= ZEROPAD;
-                               }
-                               str = number(str, end,
-                                               (unsigned long) va_arg(args, void *),
-                                               16, field_width, precision, flags);
+                               str = pointer(str, end, va_arg(args, void *), field_width, precision, flags);
                                continue;
 
-
                        case 'n':
                                /* FIXME:
                                * What does C99 say about the overflow case here? */