OK, *that's* what Clang Cat was going on about:
packet-dcerpc-pn-io.c:8438:17: warning: Although the value
stored to 'prm_flag2' is used in the enclosing expression, the
value is never actually read from 'prm_flag2'
OK, thanks for telling me that, technically,
prm_flag1 = prm_flag2 = 0;
can be implemented by storing the 0 into prm_flag1 directly rather than
storing 0 into prm_flag2 and copying it to prm_flag1. Yes, you can haz
cheeseburger.
I guess it would matter if we were actually depending on some
side-effect of fetching prm_flag2, but we're not. Rewrite this one to
squelch the complaint.
git-svn-id: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/wireshark/trunk@39841
f5534014-38df-0310-8fa8-
9805f1628bb7